EDITORIAL
Just when you thought the District Plan was all sorted, the Wellington City Council starts a survey on heritage areas.

Heritage areas work because they are relatively intact areas.If one property owner decides to delist and allow their home to be knocked down and replaced with a multi-storey apartment block, the effect of the heritage area diminishes.In other words, it is not at all clear how this could even be workable - at least in a way that makes sense to those who value heritage.
How has it come to this?
For a long time, heritage was relatively widely accepted as adding value to our city, and deserving of protection. Anyone who has travelled knows that tourists are drawn to historic areas of a town, and indeed it is Mt Victoria’s quaint wooden houses on the hillside that are so often used in publicity material for Wellington.
But in recent years, views have shifted among some to seeing heritage as a burden and bringing unacceptable costs.
Although these costs have mainly related to large civic projects like the Town Hall refurbishment, the general vibe of impatience seems to have carried over to anything old.
Anti-character Minister Chris Bishop even went to the extent of passing bespoke legislation to enable the heritage-listed Gorden Wilson Flats to be torn down. That politician is now working on a new RMA that may make it easier to delist heritage buildings and sites.
It seems likely that if the powers are put in place, there are at least some councillors who will want to use them. And there will be some property owners who find heritage restrictions frustrating and may welcome the opportunity to free themselves to do what they want with their property.Their personal freedom will come at the expense of the collective; heritage belongs to us all, helps tell our stories and give context to our community. Allowing further change to Mt Victoria’s intact heritage areas will signal the beginning of the end of the suburb’s distinct character.

Jane O’Loughlin
Editor, The Local – Mt Victoria



